Promise Me, America is Joe Biden's deeply personal memoir reflecting on his presidency, the challenges that shaped his administration, and the defining moments that tested American democracy. In this review, Ruzeki explores the book's key themes, major achievements, and its significance in modern U.S. political history.
Thursday, July 16, 2026
Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Senegal’s Political Earthquake: Speaker Sonko(ex-PM), President Faye, and the Battle for Power in 2026
What's happening in Senegal, between President Diomaye Faye and newly elected Speaker Ousmane Sonko?
By Ruzeki | Shadoww News | May 26, 2026
Sunday, April 19, 2026
The Decline of the American Empire and the Rise of a New Global Order
From fractured alliances to the petroyuan, the world is witnessing a historic shift in power and influence.
By Ruzeki | Shadoww News | April 19, 2026
What's happening in 2026
The geopolitical landscape in 2026 is almost unrecognizable compared to just a few years ago. Under Donald Trump’s chaotic regime, the United States is facing an unprecedented level of international isolation and strategic pushback, challenging the very foundations of its decades-long global dominance.
Key events; from military miscalculations to economic policy shifts, have accelerated a historic reshaping of military, economic, and strategic power. Experts warn that the U.S. has approached a tipping point in its global influence, as rival powers consolidate and assert themselves with unprecedented confidence.
Fractured Alliances: NATO and Europe Push Back
Once-solid alliances are showing cracks. NATO and European partners are increasingly distancing themselves from Washington’s unilateral military decisions. Countries like Germany, France, Spain, the U.K and Italy have openly questioned U.S. strategic priorities, particularly in the Middle East and Central America, signaling deep dissatisfaction with Trump’s approach.
Analysts suggest that this rift may not be temporary, long-term trust has eroded. The implications are profound: the U.S. can no longer assume automatic military or political support from its traditional allies, forcing Washington to reconsider how it projects power globally. Additionally, independent European defense and economic initiatives like engaging with China are accelerating, signaling a gradual move toward strategic shift.
Middle East Tensions Escalate to Historic Levels
The Middle East has entered a volatile new phase. An unprovoked U.S.-Israel missile campaign in Iran resulted in the assassination of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei, top military generals, and hundreds of civilians, including schoolchildren. Iran responded swiftly, targeting U.S. bases and energy infrastructure across Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, and the UAE, as well as Israel itself. The strikes have inflicted heavy losses on American forces and allies, raising serious questions about U.S. military supremacy in the region.
In the aftermath, Gulf nations have begun withdrawing support for U.S. operations, closing bases, and restricting airspace access. This represents a dramatic reversal of decades of strategic partnerships and has left the U.S. with diminished operational freedom in a region it has dominated for decades.
Analysts warn that these changes could permanently alter power dynamics in the Middle East, emboldening regional powers like Iran and potentially sparking new alliances that bypass U.S. imperialism.
Iran Controls the Strait of Hormuz
Iran has asserted unprecedented control over the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial chokepoint through which approximately 20% of global oil passes. Tehran now enforces strict transit rules and collects tolls from vessels navigating the Strait, with fees mandated in Chinese yuan rather than U.S. dollars. This move is a direct challenge to the petrodollar system that has underpinned American financial dominance for six decades.
The implications extend far beyond energy markets. By controlling this strategic chokepoint, Iran can influence global oil supply and pricing while asserting its geopolitical weight. International shipping companies and energy-dependent nations are now forced to navigate this new reality, potentially reshaping maritime security, trade alliances, and global economic dependencies.
The Rise of the Petroyuan
The shift from dollar-based oil transactions to yuan-based trade is accelerating a transformation in global finance. BRICS+ bloc has been planning for this shift for years. Major oil producers are now increasingly conducting transactions in Chinese yuan, undermining the supremacy of the U.S. dollar. Economists warn that the petroyuan is not merely a symbolic gesture, it represents a structural challenge to American financial influence.
This trend may encourage other nations to diversify their reserves and trade arrangements, weakening the dollar’s role as the world’s primary reserve currency. In addition, China’s growing influence in energy markets is redefining economic power balances, allowing Beijing to leverage its currency and strategic partnerships for global political influence.
A Multipolar World Emerges
The events of 2026 mark a historic turning point. America’s influence is waning, traditional alliances are fracturing, and emerging powers, most notably China, Russia, and Iran, are asserting themselves on the global stage. The world is moving toward a true multipolar era, where no single nation dominates across military, economic, and strategic dimensions.
This emerging order will require nations to navigate a far more complex geopolitical landscape. For the United States, adapting to this new reality will demand strategic recalibration back at home where Democrats must win, diplomatic finesse, and an acknowledgment that its historical leverage is no longer guaranteed.
Meanwhile, other nations like Canada, Spain, Brazil, South Africa, North Korea, China, and Pakistan are seizing the opportunity to reshape global norms, trade, and security arrangements in ways that reflect their interests rather than those of the former hegemon.
Follow Shadoww News
Stay updated on the latest geopolitical developments, commentaries and analysis on: Facebook, X/Twitter, YouTube, Bluesky and TikTok.
Friday, March 27, 2026
How Kenya Is Being Dragged Into a Dangerous U.S.-Israel War on Iran
Kenya could be on the frontline of a U.S.-Israel war on Iran as hundreds of American Marines train on our soil, putting the nation at unprecedented risk.
Nearly 600 U.S. Marines are training at various Kenyan military facilities, and U.S Camp Simba base, Manda Bay. Meanwhile, talks of the Kenyan Defence Forces escorting ships to the Middle East may be more than rumors; they could be a pretext to pull Kenya into an illegal U.S.-Israel war on Iran.
With Iran having destroyed the U.S. military bases across the Middle East, Africa has become a safe staging ground for American forces, especially as European countries have refused to host them.
In the last two weeks, many U.S. troops who were stationed in the Middle East have now relocated to Kenya and Diego Garcia. All signs point to preparations for a potential ground invasion of Iran.
In Washington, Trump and his war cabinet are pushing hard for a “boots on the ground” narrative, something many Americans are not buying. Trump has even asked Tehran to accept defeat and agree to a ceasefire, but Iranians have dismissed it as “Trump speaking to himself.” Nobody is taking these negotiations seriously, and the IRGC is ready to respond to any American setting foot on the Iranian soil.
This reckless strategy puts every Kenyan at risk. Since independence, Kenya has maintained good relations with the Iranian people, yet our outgoing president seems determined to drag the country into an illegal war, an excuse he could use to postpone the 2027 elections. He's making Kenya a legitimate target for the Iranian missiles, such as the Khorramshahr-4/Khaibar and Sejjil, the dancing missile, capable of hitting targets at upto 4000km.
Do we even have a functioning air defense system? The answer is clear: we do not. The consequences could be catastrophic.
Look at the Gulf states, they were hit hard by Iranian missiles while American forces avoided the brunt. If Kenya becomes involved, we could face the same fate. Complicity now could leave us paying the ultimate price.
If we stay silent, we may only realize the cost when it’s too late.
Follow us for more commentaries and analysis on Shadoww News , Facebook, X/Twitter, YouTube, Bluesky and TikTok.
Saturday, January 24, 2026
The End of the Bully Era: Why the World Must Stand Against Trump's Aggression
The World Must Stand Against Donald Trump's Madness and Aggression.
By Ruzeki | Shadoww News |January 24, 2026
The world is changing, and the era of bullies is finally coming to an end. For decades, the U.S. has used its military, political influence, and economic power to shape the world to its will often at the expense of smaller nations and global stability. But the cracks in this system are becoming more visible, and it’s clear: the giant is falling, and it wants to take everyone down with it.
At the forefront of this unraveling is none other than the current occupant of the White House; a convicted felon, a rapist, a war criminal and a pedophile, President Donald Trump. His aggressive tactics; attacking smaller nations like Venezuela, stealing resources, and bullying European allies into submission, have torn apart the fragile international order that once existed. From the Middle East to Africa, Latin America to Asia, the U.S. has left a trail of chaos, and the consequences are being felt globally. Yet, many of America’s European allies have remained complicit, standing by in silence, or worse, celebrating the devastation the U.S. has wreaked on vulnerable nations.
The Rise of a Mad King
Donald Trump has turned the U.S. from a global policeman to a global menace. His actions have proven he is not interested in diplomacy or peace. Instead, he acts like a dictator, wielding trade and military threats against even long-time allies. Why? Because he didn’t win the Nobel Peace Prize. Trump’s “Board of Peace,” a desperate attempt to mask his intentions, is already dead on arrival. Only Hungary’s authoritarian leader and a few puppets have shown interest, and even Russia’s Vladimir Putin has refused to join.
At home, Trump has turned the streets of the U.S. into a battleground, terrorizing his own citizens while Congress remains silent, complicit in his destruction. But the U.S. cannot continue to act as if it’s above the law, above international norms, and above the consequences of its actions.
The World Must Act
Now, it’s time for the world to stand up to this madness. Countries like China, Russia, and Iran; along with other serious nations, must not remain silent while the U.S. destroys the world. These nations, along with those European countries that are willing to break free from Washington’s grip, must take the lead in creating a new world order; one based on equality, respect, and cooperation, rather than exploitation and domination.
The current global system has allowed the U.S. to bully smaller nations, exploit resources, and destabilize regions without facing meaningful consequences. But as the U.S. weakens under Trump, it is becoming more desperate. The more it falls from grace, the more it seeks to drag everyone else down with it. We cannot let that happen.
China, Russia, Iran, Canada, Spain, Brazil, France, Denmark, South Africa, and other responsible nations must step into leadership roles, offering alternatives to the U.S-dominated world order. The world must stand united, not only to reject U.S. hegemony but also to forge a new path forward; one that puts people over power, cooperation over conflict, and peace over perpetual war.
Americans Must Stand Up To Trump
But it’s not just the world that must act. The American people, too, must rise up against the madness that has taken hold of their nation. The U.S. has always prided itself on being a beacon of freedom and democracy, but under Trump, that vision has been twisted into something dangerous and destructive.
Americans must demand an end to the chaos and get rid of the mad king who has turned their country into an international pariah. The U.S. cannot continue on this path if it hopes to regain any semblance of respect on the world stage. For this to happen, the American people need to push for change, from the streets, from the ballot box in November's midterm and 2028, and from every institution in the country.
A Call for Decisive Action
The time to act is now. The world is watching, and the stakes have never been higher. The U.S under Trump has become a rogue state, and the world cannot afford to let this unchecked aggression continue. Countries around the globe must rise up, reject the toxic influence of the U.S., and work together to build a more just and peaceful world. The global balance must shift, and it must shift now.
The world must say no—and back it up with decisive actions.
We cannot afford to wait any longer. We cannot afford to be complicit. The bully’s reign is coming to an end, and it’s time for the world to stand together and ensure that it ends in peace, not destruction.
Follow us for more commentaries and analysis on Shadoww News , Facebook, X/Twitter, YouTube, Bluesky and TikTok.
Sunday, January 4, 2026
Oil First, Questions Later: Trump Says America Will Run Venezuela After Maduro Abduction
After abducting President Maduro, Trump says the U.S. will run Venezuela using its oil. Latin America, Africa, China, Russia and Asia push back against renewed U.S. imperialism.
By Ruzeki | Shadoww News | The WanTam Weekly | January 04, 2026
Wednesday, December 3, 2025
Trump Orders Maduro to Step Down, But Venezuela Resists Amid Growing Tensions
U.S-Venezuela relations have reached boiling point. Here’s everything you need to know about the U.S military strikes in Venezuela.
By Ruzeki | Shadoww News | The WanTam Weekly | December 03, 2025
In recent months, United States President Donald Trump has sharply escalated his attacks on Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, accusing him of fuelling drug trafficking and driving mass migration from the Caribbean nation into the US.
After weeks of escalating rhetoric and deadly airstrikes ordered by Trump, Secretary of 'War' Hegseth, U.S. President Donald Trump continues to issueultimatums to Venezuelan President NicolΓ‘s Maduro: step down or face further military action. Maduro, however, responded defiantly, rallying thousands of supporters in Caracas, where he danced and made it clear that he was ready for war with the United States.
The chances of Maduro leaving voluntarily seem increasingly slim. Despite mounting pressure from the U.S. including aircraft carriers stationed off Venezuela's coast, a $50 million bounty on his head, and increasing military strikes, the Venezuelan president has shown no signs of surrendering.
Trump's strategy seems to hinge on a mix of threats, military strikes, and a heavy military presence in the region in the hopes of either forcing Maduro into exile or coercing top Venezuelan generals to overthrow him. However, the situation is fraught with risk. In addition to the political cost at home, Trump faces opposition from within the U.S. population, with a recent CBS News poll showing 70% of Americans against military intervention in Venezuela.
Trump has already ordered several strikes on civilian boats and threatened to target Venezuelan drug cartels on land. He also declared Venezuelan airspace closed, a significant escalation that has raised concerns about a potential full-scale military conflict.
Venezuela’s position is far from isolated, however. Despite the U.S. buildup in the Caribbean, Venezuela still has strong allies in Russia and China. Following the U.S.'s imposition of harsh sanctions on Venezuela in 2017, Maduro's government turned to Russia for economic and military support. In May, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Maduro signed a strategic partnership, agreeing to jointly explore and develop new oil and gas fields, as well as to expand oil trading operations.
With the world's largest oil reserves, Venezuela is a key player in global energy markets, making it a strategic target for the U.S., which has long sought to control the country’s vast energy resources.
As the situation continues to unfold, the question remains: will Maduro be forced into exile, or will Venezuela’s ties to powerful allies be enough to keep him in power?
Follow for more commentaries and analysis on Shadoww News , Facebook, X/Twitter, YouTube, Bluesky and TikTok.
Saturday, November 1, 2025
President William Ruto's Role in Sudan Genocide: How Kenya's Arms, Passports and Blood Gold Fuel RSF War Crimes
Why Are General Hemedti and Commander William Ruto Ordering the RSF to Kill Innocent Women and Children?
WHY?
A Dangerous Legacy of Violence
May the souls of the 2,000 innocent El-Fasher civilians rest in eternal peace.
The Role of Blood Gold in Fueling the Conflict
Smuggling Routes and Geopolitical Ties
Kenya’s Role in the Gold Trade
The Call for Accountability
Final Call
Tuesday, October 28, 2025
U.S. Continues to Target Maduro: Pilot who Saved Venezuelan President from CIA Plot.
Thursday, August 7, 2025
Review of Kenya’s Major Non-NATO Ally (MNNA) Status
By Ruzeki, Shadoww News
August 07, 2025
The designation of Kenya as a Major Non-NATO Ally (MNNA) by the United States on June 24, 2024, marked a significant diplomatic milestone—but it also triggered deep scrutiny.
This review examines whether Kenya’s political conduct, security alignments, and financial dealings genuinely reflect the values and responsibilities expected of a U.S. strategic partner.
Review of Kenya’s Major Non-NATO Ally (MNNA) Status Conferred: June 24, 2024
Subject of Review: Government of Kenya (GoK)
The designation of Kenya as a Major Non-NATO Ally (MNNA) by the United States was a strategic milestone. However, with privilege comes scrutiny. The following areas are under review, with attention to inconsistencies, covert alignments, and potential abuse of the MNNA status by the Government of Kenya (GoK) and its leadership.
1. Kenya–U.S. Partnership in Countering Violent Extremism (Sub-Saharan Africa & Haiti)
Assessment:
Kenya has been praised for its regional role in peacekeeping and counterterrorism, notably in Somalia (AMISOM/ATMIS) and most recently in Haiti. However, effectiveness is undercut by operational opacity, logistical failures, and accusations of brutality by Kenyan forces abroad.Critique:
The GoK has often leveraged counterterrorism as a diplomatic shield while neglecting internal reforms on accountability. Kenya’s security forces continue to be marred by extrajudicial killings, forced disappearances, and profiling of peaceful protesters and ethnic groups under the guise of CVE (Countering Violent Extremism). The deployment to Haiti may serve U.S. strategic optics more than genuine regional stabilization.2. Military and Security Engagement with China, Russia, and Iran
Assessment:
Despite close ties with the U.S., Kenya maintains active defense cooperation with China (military equipment procurement, surveillance tech), and growing diplomatic gestures toward Russia and Iran.
Critique:
The GoK appears to play both sides—accepting U.S. security privileges while flirting with what the West see as authoritarian states. These parallel alignments raise alarms about conflicted loyalties and undermine the spirit of MNNA cooperation. Kenya’s acquisition of surveillance systems from China, some allegedly used against civil society and opposition, contradicts democratic values underpinning MNNA designations.
3. Political and Financial Ties of Key Political Actors with China, Russia & Iran
Assessment:
Several high-profile Kenyan politicians led by President Ruto and his close businessmen have opaque financial dealings and partnerships with entities linked to Beijing, Moscow, and Tehran.
Critique:
These relationships compromise Kenya’s geopolitical posture. While U.S. aid and intelligence flow into Nairobi, Chinese loans quietly balloon and Russian disinformation campaigns find fertile ground in Kenya’s digital space. The entanglement of top Kenyan officials with sanctioned Iranian networks further casts doubt on the integrity of the country's foreign policy and financial institutions.
4. GoK and Its Officials’ Relationships with Non-State Armed Groups (RSF, Al-Shabaab)
Assessment:
Kenya’s porous borders and the murky involvement of some state officials in illicit arms and smuggling networks create opportunities for collusion with armed groups, including Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF) and remnants of Al-Shabaab.
Critique:
There is disturbing evidence—both anecdotal and intelligence-based—suggesting state complicity or willful negligence in dealings with non-state actors. This includes the laundering of illicit wealth through Kenyan banks, facilitation of safe passage, and political protection of profiteers. The government's inability—or refusal—to prosecute those involved points to systemic rot and dangerous tolerance of extremist-linked networks.
5. Trade and Investment with China – Debt, Commercial Ties, and Belt & Road Initiative
Assessment:
Kenya is deeply embedded in China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), with billions in loans tied to infrastructure and extractive deals. These have ballooned Kenya’s public debt and created structural dependence.
Critique:
The GoK has consistently failed to renegotiate or transparently manage Chinese debt, instead engaging in debt diplomacy appeasement. Some BRI projects lack public value yet bind Kenya into long-term financial obligations that threaten sovereignty. The U.S. must now contend with a “strategic ally” that is economically hostage to Beijing.
6. Kenya as a Financial Safe Haven for Regional Elites, War Profiteers, and Terrorists
Assessment:
Kenya’s financial system is increasingly used as a laundering hub for elites from Sudan, South Sudan, Uganda, and Somalia. Nairobi’s real estate, banking, and remittance systems are exploited by politically exposed persons (PEPs), warlords, and terror financiers.
Critique:
The GoK’s failure to reform or audit its financial institutions has made Kenya a regional laundromat for dirty money. While the U.S. pours resources into financial surveillance and anti-terrorism funding, Kenyan institutions continue to shield or ignore illegal capital flows—some directly funding violence and insurgencies in neighboring states.
7. Use of U.S. Intelligence & Security Assistance for Domestic Repression
Assessment:
While U.S. security and intelligence tools are intended to bolster legitimate counterterrorism and public safety, there is growing concern that the Kenyan state uses this support to suppress civil liberties and target political dissent.
Critique:
There are credible reports of U.S.-trained units being involved in renditions, torture, abductions, and domestic surveillance of journalists, activists and civilians. These actions erode trust and violate the very principles MNNA status is meant to uphold. Kenya’s security apparatus, under minimal civilian oversight, has become a tool of state-sponsored political violence, especially against youth, opposition leaders, and some ethnic groups.
Is Kenya A Strategic Ally or a Double Agent?
While Kenya presents itself as a democratic bulwark in a volatile region, its geopolitical double-dealing, internal abuses, and financial opaqueness paint a more disturbing picture. The GoK’s exploitation of U.S. support for domestic repression, strategic hedging with autocracies, and permissiveness toward terror-linked finances calls for a comprehensive reevaluation of its MNNA status.
The United States must condition continued support on:
- Transparent audits of military aid and training use
- Reforms in financial oversight and anti-money laundering enforcement
- Immediate end to the use of U.S. tools for political repression
- Clear distancing from state and non-state actors in Russia, China, Iran, and regional war economies
Kenya cannot continue to speak Washington’s language while dancing to Beijing’s drums. Either it walks the democratic path in full, or it risks being stripped of the privileges that come with MNNA designation.
What are your thoughts?
Sunday, June 1, 2025
Stay Informed: Top Global News Channels You Should Follow
By Ruzeki, Shadoww News
June 01, 2025
In a world where information is power, staying updated with credible global news is more important than ever. Whether you're tracking international politics, economics, or major social movements, here are the most trusted news channels from around the world you should follow:
π International Mainstream Media:
CNN (Cable News Network, U.S.): Known for breaking news and in-depth analysis.
NBC News (National Broadcasting Company, U.S): Offers mainstream news and powerful political commentary.
MSNBC News (Microsoft National Broadcast Corporation, U.S.): Offers mainstream news plus unique political commentary.
BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation, UK): Local and global coverage with a balanced tone.
Reuters (Canada): Leading source of global news. Wire services trusted for accuracy and speed. HIGHLY RECOMMENDED!
Associated Press (AP, U.S.): Wire services trusted for accuracy and speed. HIGHLY RECOMMENDED!
France24 (France): Great for global affairs, especially Europe and Africa.
Deutsche Welle (DW, Germany): Global news with a European perspective.
WION (India): "World Is One News" — emerging as a global player with a non-Western lens.
TASS (Russia): State-run, but gives insight into Russian framing of global events.
CGTN (China Global Television Network): China’s official English-language news outlet.
π Other Regional Powerhouses:
Press TV (Iran): State media offering Iran’s view on international affairs.
Ahram Online (Egypt): One of the top English-language news sources from the Arab world.
NTV Kenya: Key sources for East African and Kenyan national news. Others include KTN and K24.
eNCA (South Africa): Leading English-language news broadcaster in Southern Africa.
For balanced understanding, follow outlets from different regions. It helps you cut through bias and form an informed worldview.
Wednesday, May 7, 2025
Tensions Soar as India and Pakistan Exchange Strikes Following Pahalgam Deadly Attack
By Ruzeki, Shadoww News
May 7, 2025
A tit-for-tat strikes represent the most serious flare-up in years between the two nuclear-armed neighbors
New Delhi/Islamabad — India launched airstrikes on nine locations in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir early Tuesday morning, in response to a militant assault in Pahalgam that left 26 civilians dead. The Indian government described the operation as a "precision retaliation" targeting militant infrastructure.
“At 0400 hours, Indian Air Force jets struck carefully selected militant launch pads across the border. This is a measured response to the unprovoked killing of innocent lives in Pahalgam,” said Indian Defense Minister Rajnath Singh in a press briefing.
The strikes reportedly resulted in seven deaths, including at least two children, according to Pakistani officials.
In a swift retaliation, Pakistan launched a barrage of ballistic and cruise missiles into Indian territory, earlier Wednesday. The Pakistani military stated the response was “necessary to uphold national sovereignty."
“We will not allow any violation of our airspace or aggression against our people to go unanswered,” said Pakistani Army spokesperson Major General Ahmed Niazi.
Artillery exchanges have also erupted along the Line of Control in Kashmir, with both sides reporting civilian displacements and damage to infrastructure.
Residents in border villages are bracing for further escalation. “We heard explosions all night. We’re scared for our children,” said Farah Bano, a resident of Kupwara in Indian-administered Kashmir.
Military analysts warn that the tit-for-tat strikes represent the most serious flare-up in years between the two nuclear-armed neighbors, who are sworn enemies.
“This is a critical moment. Both countries need to pull back and re-establish communication channels. A full-scale conflict would be catastrophic not just for the region but globally,” said Arvind Menon, a South Asia security expert based in Delhi.
The international community has called for restraint, with the United Nations urging both nations to de-escalate and return to diplomatic dialogue.
We shall update you whenever new information is available.
Thursday, March 20, 2025
America on the Brink: How Trump’s Policies Are Fueling Economic Decline
March 20, 2025
Wednesday, February 19, 2025
Ruto’s Foreign Policy Missteps That Cost Raila the AUC race.
February 19, 2025
Foreign Policy Missteps That Cost Raila
- Called French President Macron when Kivu fell, despite France’s complicity in the crisis—angered Francophone nations.
- Hosted M23 militia leaders in Nairobi—alienated 16 SADC member states.
- Welcomed Sudan’s RSF rebel leader to Kenya—provoked backlash from the Arab world.
- Expressed support for Israel despite mounting evidence of genocide in Gaza.
- Aligned with the U.S. in the Ukraine-Russia war, undermining the AU’s mediation efforts.
- Recognized Eastern Saharawi on his first day in office, contradicting the AU’s stance.
- Abducted and deported Ugandan opposition figure Giza Besigye, now on hunger strike in a military prison.
- Issued conflicting statements on key geopolitical matters, diverging from AU regional blocs.
- Misled the public about Kenya’s payment to host the Grammys.
- Attempted to bribe Djibouti’s AUC candidate, Mahmoud Youssouf, to drop out of the race.
- (In Feb 2023) Pressured the AU to dismiss Raila as AU Special Envoy for Infrastructure, terming Raila as violence instigator in Kenya. (In 2025) Asks the same AU to vote for Raila.
Tuesday, February 18, 2025
The Ongoing Push for United Nations Security Council Reform
February 18, 2025
Momentum is building for reforms in the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), with growing demands for expansion to better align with the current global power structure.
Global Push for UNSC Expansion
Germany, India, Japan, and Brazil are among the leading UN members lobbying for permanent seats in the UNSC. However, their bids face strong opposition from two of the current permanent members:
- Russia opposes Germany and Japan’s inclusion.
- The United States resists Brazil and India’s bids.
Both nations have strategically used their veto power to stall reforms and counter each other's influence.
Africa’s Demand for Permanent Representation
The African Union (AU), representing 54 UN member states, has been vocal in demanding two permanent seats to ensure Africa has a stronger voice in global decision-making.
Among African nations, South Africa has emerged as a strong contender due to its economic strength, diplomatic influence, and active role in peacekeeping.
However, Africa is pushing for two permanent seats. This raises the question:
Which other African country should join South Africa in representing the continent in the UNSC?
- Nigeria – Africa’s largest economy with strong regional influence.
- Egypt – A historical diplomatic leader with control over the Suez Canal.
- Algeria – A key player in counterterrorism and Sahel security.
- Kenya – A major contributor to peacekeeping and regional stability.
Egypt and South Africa: The Best Fit for Africa
Among the contenders, Egypt and South Africa offer the strongest combination of diplomatic, military, and economic influence.
- Egypt brings global strategic importance, historical leadership, and control over the Suez Canal.
- South Africa represents Sub-Saharan Africa, has a strong democratic tradition, and plays a leading role in peacekeeping and economic affairs.
This pairing ensures balanced representation of both North and Sub-Saharan Africa in global decision-making.
Why the U.S. Resists UNSC Reform
Despite increasing pressure for reform, the United States remains reluctant to allow UNSC expansion. Here’s why:
-
Maintaining Its Dominance
- The current UNSC structure favors U.S. influence, allowing it to veto decisions that go against its interests.
- More permanent members could dilute U.S. power and make global decision-making harder to control.
-
Concerns Over Rival Nations
- The U.S. opposes Brazil and India’s inclusion, fearing they could strengthen alternative alliances like BRICS+.
- More UNSC seats could increase Russia and China’s influence if new members align with them.
-
Selective Support for Allies
- The U.S. supports Japan and Germany, but not full UNSC reform, fearing unpredictable shifts in power.
- It prefers NATO and bilateral alliances over restructuring global institutions.
-
Fear of a Weaker Veto Power
- More permanent members could lead to more veto powers, making it harder for the U.S. to block decisions, especially in regions like the Middle East.
-
Political and Bureaucratic Hurdles
- UNSC reform requires two-thirds approval in the UN General Assembly and no veto from the five permanent members (U.S., Russia, China, France, UK).
- The U.S. sees this as too risky, as it could trigger a domino effect, allowing unexpected countries to gain influence.
Will the U.S. Ever Support UNSC Reform?
The U.S. may eventually support limited reforms, but only if it can ensure that new members align with its strategic interests.
However, as long as Russia and China hold veto power, the U.S. will likely block major changes to prevent a shift in global power.
The Future of UNSC Reform: A Long Battle Ahead
The fight for UNSC reform will be long and complex, but growing pressure from Africa, Latin America, and Asia might eventually force change.
The big question remains:
Will the world embrace a more balanced UNSC, or will the great powers keep delaying reforms?
What’s your prediction? Will reform happen, or will the status quo remain?
Support us via PayPal or MPESA/Sendwave
Saturday, February 15, 2025
Why Raila Lost the AUC election: A Geopolitical and Domestic Analysis
February 15, 2025
Here's a geopolitical and domestic analysis of why Raila Lost
Raila Odinga’s recent political setback in Addis Ababa wasn’t just about local dynamics—it was influenced by regional geopolitics, international alignments, and Kenya’s internal power struggles. While many attribute his loss to domestic political maneuvers, broader global and continental forces played a critical role.
1. Ruto’s Influence and Kenya’s Pro-US Stance
At the center of this outcome is President William Ruto, whose government has leaned heavily towards the United States and Western allies. This shift directly clashes with China’s growing influence in Africa, forcing geopolitical realignments. Raila, seen as a more neutral figure with historical ties to both Western and Eastern blocs, may have faced indirect opposition from actors aligned with China’s interests.
2. China’s Deep Ties with Djibouti
Djibouti, home to China’s only overseas military base, has become a strategic outpost for Beijing’s ambitions in Africa. The country’s leadership holds significant sway within the African Union Commission (AUC) and broader continental policymaking. China operatives were busy lobbying for Djibouti's candidate Mahmoud Ali Yousouff. Given Kenya’s pro-Western alignment under Ruto, China may have found a Raila-led Kenya less geopolitically favorable, influencing power plays within African institutions.
3. The China-US Power Games in Africa
Africa has become a battleground for US-China rivalry, with economic, military, and political stakes at play. Ruto has aggressively courted the West, securing major deals, while countries like Ethiopia, Djibouti, and South Africa remain deeply tied to China. This broader alignment may have influenced diplomatic maneuvers within the AU, subtly impacting Raila’s chances.
4. Conflicts in DRC and Sudan Shaping AU Priorities
The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) conflict, coupled with Sudan’s ongoing crisis, has redirected AU’s focus towards regional security concerns. With Kenya actively involved in peace efforts—often in line with US and Western interests—Raila’s potential leadership could have disrupted existing security partnerships. The AU, influenced by multiple geopolitical actors, may have favored stability over change.
5. Recent Political Developments in Kenya
Domestically, Kenya has been rocked by high-profile abductions, state repression, and corruption scandals. Ruto has been accused of consolidating power through questionable means, including allegations of being among the world’s most corrupt leaders. This has tarnished Kenya’s image but also strengthened Ruto’s grip on institutions, making it difficult for Raila to mount a successful challenge.
6. The Francophone vs. Anglophone Divide
A longstanding but often overlooked factor in AU politics is the Francophone vs. Anglophone rivalry. France, through its traditional spheres of influence in West and Central Africa, continues to wield significant control. Kenya, an Anglophone powerhouse, often faces resistance from Francophone-aligned blocs in AU decision-making. Raila, despite his pan-African credentials, may have been a victim of these deep-seated power struggles.
A Perfect Storm of Continental and Global Factors
Raila’s defeat wasn’t just about Kenyan politics—it was shaped by Africa’s evolving geopolitical landscape, international power struggles, and internal realignments within the AU. As Kenya cements its pro-Western stance, China’s silent maneuvers and Africa’s internal power plays will continue shaping the region’s political future.
Sunday, September 15, 2024
Yemen's Houthis hits central Israel for the first time
By Ruzeki, Shadoww News
September 15, 2024
Friday, September 6, 2024
Today's worldwide headlines
By Ruzeki, Shadoww News
Sep 6, 2024Saturday, June 1, 2024
The New World Order and the Changing Geopolitical Landscape
By Ruzeki, Shadoww News
June 01, 2024
The idea of a "New World Order" is gaining attention as the world's political landscape changes significantly. These changes are driven by new technologies, shifts in economic power, and the evolving roles of major countries. This article explains how these factors are shaping the New World Order and what it means for international relations today.
The End of U.S. Dominance
After the Cold War, the United States was the dominant global power for almost three decades. However, this dominance is now fading, thanks to China and Russia which are becoming more powerful, challenging the U.S. and creating a world where power is shared among several countries.
China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is a good example of this shift. Through large infrastructure projects around the world, China is increasing its influence. Meanwhile, Russia's aggressive actions in places like Ukraine and Syria show its desire to be a major player again.
Technology and Cyber Power
Technology is a key factor in the changing geopolitical landscape. The competition for supremacy in areas like artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and 5G networks is intense among the U.S., China, and the European Union. These technologies are crucial for future economic and military strength.
Cyber security is also a major issue. Countries are constantly engaging in cyber attacks and espionage, trying to protect their own digital infrastructure while targeting others. This new kind of warfare challenges traditional ideas about borders and national security.
Changes in the Economy and Trade
Economic power is central to geopolitical influence. In recent years, there has been a shift towards more protectionist and nationalist economic policies. The trade war between the U.S. and China is a clear example of this, as both countries are trying to become less economically dependent on each other.
The COVID-19 pandemic made these trends even more pronounced, revealing weaknesses in global supply chains and pushing countries to seek more economic independence. Regional trade agreements, like the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) in Asia, are becoming more important, reshaping global trade and economic relationships.
International Institutions Under Pressure
International institutions like the United Nations, the World Trade Organization, World Bank, the UN Security Council, and the International Monetary Fund are facing challenges. Most of these institutions were created after World War II to promote global cooperation, but many now see them as oppressive, outdated and ineffective.
Emerging powers want these institutions to change to better reflect the current balance of global power. The BRICS+ group (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Iran, Ethiopia, Saudi Arabi, Egypt, and the UAE ) is advocating for a world order that reduces Western dominance. The future of these institutions depends on their ability to adapt and the willingness of major countries to work together.
Regional Conflicts and New Alliances
Regional conflicts and changing alliances add to the complexity of the geopolitical landscape. In the Middle East, the rivalry between Israel and Iran continues to cause instability. Meanwhile, the Israeli war in Gaza, which has resulted in over 40,000 civilian deaths is threatening normalized relations between Israel and several Arab states.
In Asia, the Indo-Pacific region is a hotspot of geopolitical tension. The U.S. and its allies, including Japan, South Korea, and Australia, are aggressively working to counter China's growing influence. This has led to very volatile geopolitical situation in the Indo-Pacific; as China could militarily take control of Taiwan.
The New World Order is shaped by a mix of rising powers, technological advancements, economic shifts, and changing alliances.
Monday, May 20, 2024
BREAKING: The ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan Announces Applications for Arrest Warrants in Relation to Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant
By Ruzeki, Shadoww News
May 20, 2024
The ICC chief Prosecutor Karim Khan announces the arrest warrants of Israel's PM Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant for war crimes against the state of Palestine.
Meanwhile, in Tel Aviv, there's massive protest demanding that PM Netanyahu resign.
On the basis of evidence collected and examined by my Office, I have reasonable grounds to believe that Benjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of Israel, and Yoav Gallant, the Minister of Defence of Israel, bear criminal responsibility for the following war crimes and crimes against humanity committed on the territory of the State of Palestine (in the Gaza strip) from at least 8 October 2023:
- Starvation of civilians as a method of warfare as a war crime contrary to article 8(2)(b)(xxv) of the Statute;
- Wilfully causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or health contrary to article 8(2)(a)(iii), or cruel treatment as a war crime contrary to article 8(2)(c)(i);
- Wilful killing contrary to article 8(2)(a)(i), or Murder as a war crime contrary to article 8(2)(c)(i);
- Intentionally directing attacks against a civilian population as a war crime contrary to articles 8(2)(b)(i), or 8(2)(e)(i);
- Extermination and/or murder contrary to articles 7(1)(b) and 7(1)(a), including in the context of deaths caused by starvation, as a crime against humanity;
- Persecution as a crime against humanity contrary to article 7(1)(h);
- Other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity contrary to article 7(1)(k).





